Search for: "People v. Render" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
 Kenneth Vercammen & Associates Law Office helps people injured due to the negligence of others. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:49 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Impeachment of a Verdict Based on a Juror’s Unwillingness to Deliberate The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Five rendered an opinion in Cornavaca v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
This claim may be largely well-intended, but the inference that addicted people are rendered helpless by their brain physiology is a form of simplistic neuro-reductionism that is refuted by solid research. [read post]
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am by CFM Admin
The People’s Bank of China (“PBoC”), China’s central bank and financial regulator, announced an immediate ban of ICOs within China. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
Norovirus is highly contagious and can spread anywhere people gather or food is served, making people sick with vomiting and diarrhea. [16]“Norovirus outbreaks from contaminated food in restaurants are far too common. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
   Hearing Impaired Juror Requests an Accommodation Late The Court of Appeal, Third District of California rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
If apps cannot render legal services affordable, law societies will not be able to prevent, by way of UPL prosecutions, the commercial producers of legal services (LegalZoom, RocketLawyer, and LegalX, etc.) from successfully targeting the market of the general practitioner, as has been proved by their great success in the U.S. [read post]