Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 1961 - 1980 of 12,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 6:47 am by Tony Mauro
And if I see 30, I think, Well, he thinks he’s really got the law on his side because he only took up 30. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
What my friend did not know was, that under Illinois' statutes, he could have been charged with resisting a peace officer (if they would have caught him).The defendant in People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 5:45 pm
In ultimately determining that the indictment should not be dismissed in its entirety and the prosecution could proceed with the charge of Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree, the First Department followed the Court of Appeals Decision in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:22 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As the court notes, the feud between the parties largely took place online, but eventually “found its way into federal court”. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
  Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Finally, the judge took up Taha’s claim for “false light,” a concept I’ve discussed in prior posts. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:02 am
**A couple of weeks ago, in response to a New York Times editorial critical of continued U.S. support for General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's U.N. ambassador, Munir Akram, took a break from his duties as diplomat to perform a quick stint as media critic (thanks, SAJAforum). [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
   It appears that he also took video footage of those under surveillance. [read post]