Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2024, 5:22 am by jonathanturley
For example, in his famous concurrence to Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The most intriguing, as the Court heard the case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
His key to liberation for the Chicano community is to develop a strong power base with heavy reliance on nationalism among Chicanos. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
His key to liberation for the Chicano community is to develop a strong power base with heavy reliance on nationalism among Chicanos. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
The Text Requires The Vacancy To Arise During The Recess The most straightforward reading of the Clause is that the President may fill offices that became vacant during the recess, through death, resignation, or removal of the previous office holder, by conclusion of a fixed term, or (perhaps) by creation of the office. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am by Garrick Pursley
  In 1881, President Chester Arthur boasted that allotment "would have a direct and powerful influence in dissolving the tribal bond, which is so prominent a feature of savage life, and which tends so strongly to perpetuate it." [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]