Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 1961 - 1980 of 9,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 1:05 pm by Amy Howe
United States (Nov. 30): Whether it is a federal crime for someone with permission to access information on a computer to access that information for an improper purpose. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am by Keith Mallinson
Delrahim rightly states that “[w]e should not transform commitments to license on FRAND terms into a compulsory licensing scheme. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
 The United States Capitol Historical Society announced that its 2020 National Heritage Lecture, delivered virtually on September 14, 2020, will be a discussion of “one of the most far-reaching accomplishments of mid-20th century American government: The comprehensive and strategic investment in our transportation infrastructure. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Edible Arrangements, LLC United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division August 27, 2020, Filed Case No. 3:20-cv-00479   Reporter 2020 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
Its two partners, Robert Liss and Sage Systems, Inc., held 43.07% and 56.93% partnership interests, respectively. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by Adam Feldman
Since the beginning of the Roberts court, the percentage of SCOTUS cases from state courts has, for the most part, hovered between 10 and 20%. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
In the absence of controlling United States Supreme Court authority, we are bound by the Oregon Supreme Court, not the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Before being appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court, Justice Bolick had been one of the leading libertarian lawyers in the country (he cofounded the Institute for Justice); this is from his opinion today in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:22 am by Whitney Hodges
As society responds to the COVID-19 pandemic, states and local governments across the United States, including the State of California, issued shelter-in place (“SIP”) orders[i] to prevent its spread. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
” But, he continues, “it was by no means the final legal battle over educational choice in the United States. [read post]