Search for: "Rogers v State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am by Elim
Rogers, Introduction to the Study and Practice of Law in a Nutshell, 7th ed. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
The relevant distinction would presumably be congressionalists v. presidentialists, and I wonder how many of the Balkinization regulars are truly happy with the status quo. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am by Elim
Rogers, Introduction to the Study and Practice of Law in a Nutshell, 7th ed. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and   Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm by Marie Louise
nostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury (IPKat) ECJ rules on scope of fair compensation for private copying exceptions: Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Authores y Editores de España (SGAE) Case C-467/08 (JIPLP) India Patentability of method/process claims- Application of recent US case law to the Indian Patent Act section 3(k) (Spicy IP) Ireland Ireland joins copyright review queue (IPKat) Netherlands Court… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Fisons Corp., 858 P.2d 1054, 1061 (Wash. 1993); Rogers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions:  United States v. [read post]