Search for: "Russell, Appeal of" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:49 am by Manal Cheema, Ashley Deeks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the defendant’s actions violated § 229. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
On 15 June 2017, there was an application in the appeal of Economou v Freitas. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
HolderDocket: 10-920Issue(s): (1) Whether federal courts are categorically incompetent to review a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings sua sponte, even where that decision applies a legal standard, on the ground that such decisions are "committed to agency discretion by law"; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred by disregarding the BIA’s stated grounds for its decision, in conflict with SEC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:06 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Global sought mandamus relief, which the court of appeals granted in part. 271 S.W.3d 442. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
 Nevertheless, as have other courts, the Court of Appeals held that even in the absence of an attorney-client relationship, an insurer may bring a claim for equitable subrogation. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
The Indiana court of appeals agreed that the excessive fines clause should be applied (incorporated) against the states. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am by MBettman
In a split decision authored by Judge Dennis Deters, joined by Judge Russell Mock, the First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision to convict Buttery. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
 Nevertheless, as have other courts, the Court of Appeals held that even in the absence of an attorney-client relationship, an insurer may bring a claim for equitable subrogation. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Hart, Glen Hansen and Brian Russell Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2014 2nd Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit erred when it denied a certificate of appealability regarding petitioner’s claim that the definition of a “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
  David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Amy Gardner and Matt DeLong of the Washington Post, Trip Gabriel at The Caucus blog of the New York Times, Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, Russell Berman at The Hill, Fox News, and The Daily Beast all provide coverage. [read post]