Search for: "S Spencer" Results 1961 - 1980 of 4,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Moreover, as we explained in our brief, these calculations may even underestimate the effect of the Second Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Spencer (M.D.) 2014 SCC 43; 2014 CSC 43Civil Rights – Criminal Law – Trade Regulation Summary: The accused was charged with possession of child pornography and making available child pornography. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 3:54 am by Broc Romanek
“You can call it greenish mail,” said Spencer Klein, a lawyer with Morrison & Foerster LLP who advises companies facing activist investors. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:12 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 Spencer Collins told Fox4kc that he worked with his father and grandfather to build the library as a gift to his mother on Mother’s Day. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm
Robert Spencer of the Anglican Diocese and I were the only other persons present.You may download the entire argument and listen to it from a link at this page on the Court's Website.Mary Kostel began with the appellant's argument, which urged that courts must always defer to a "hierarchical" church like ECUSA. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Mark Lewis
Okay, okay, I know, bad pun but I spent formative years watching the Simpson’s and if you can’t have a bit of word smithing fun on Summer Solstice eve, when can you? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:48 am by Michael Geist
Further, the Conservative leader in the Senate claims Spencer has “no impact whatsoever” on Bill S-4. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
For another recent case holding that a trademark can’t be registered because it’s disparaging, see this post about the appellate decision in In re Geller & Spencer. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Spencers right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by Howard Knopf
  Notwithstanding the Spencer decision, Bill S-4 passed by Senate without amendments on Monday, June 16, 2014. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:22 am by Michael Geist
” Indeed, the government’s recently appointed Privacy Commissioner also pointed to Spencer and urged the government to consider the implications on S-4. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:41 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, June 16, 2014:Driver’s licence revoked for drunk driving? [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of R v Spencer (2014 SCC 43), the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that internet users have a reasonable expectation of privacy and anonymity online. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 related to privacy interests in person subscriber information… -> Is spam really a problem?! [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 related to privacy interests in person subscriber information… -> Is spam really a problem?! [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-06-12: Ready for Canada’s Anti-Spam Law CASL.? [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-06-12: Ready for Canada’s Anti-Spam Law CASL.? [read post]