Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am by Walter Olson
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 6:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The CEO, Scott State, said to plaintiff, "Burt, you're 71 years of age, how long do you expect to work? [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Harris 19-466Issues: (1) Whether in Scott v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Joseph Scott Miller, United States Supreme Court Ip Cases, 1810-2019: Measuring & Mapping the Citation Networks, 69 Cath. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:49 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Alienation of affection involves a spouse suing a third party for interfering with the marriage’s companionship and affections, while criminal conversation is related to adultery (or in the words of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, "based on the violation of the fundamental right to exclusive sexual intercourse between spouses," Scott v. [read post]