Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
United States, in which the Court – again divided six to three – held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial does not have a right to a hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the money to hire a lawyer to defend him against the charges. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: That is conferring upon the ICJ the responsibility to decide the meaning of a United States treaty which is United States law. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
" In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
United States, 09–1555, and Beer v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
For a good noteup checklist, contact me.Maybe Westlaw thinks Scalia was wrong, but… On May 26, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Montejo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
Firing a worker’s fiancé in retaliation for a sex discrimination claim filed by the worker is itself unlawful, the United States Supreme Court ruled. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
9 May 2009, 5:23 am
During the Bush administration, the commissions generated a lot heat among civil libertarians in the United States and abroad.As a Senator, Obama voted against the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and he successfully campaigned on the promise that he would would restore the image of the United States in the international community. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Unite Here Local 355 v Mulhall, in which the Justices are considering whether a so-called neutrality agreement between a union and employer is a thing of “value” within the meaning of Section 302 of the NLRA and thus prohibited as a felony. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Today's fifth and final opinion issued in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:35 am
Stoneridge v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
Two well-known and experienced members of the United States Supreme Court appellate bar, Thomas C. [read post]
