Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 5,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 7:57 am
Witt moved to suppress the gun, arguing that the search and seizure were unreasonable. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
R.B., supra.The court went on to point out that theFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: `The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:23 am
Here, no search warrant was obtained, and no exception to the search-warrant requirement excused O’Reilly’s viewing of the second video. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
She contends that the search and seizure violated her Fourth Amendment rights because law enforcement instructed a computer technician to locate, play, and copy the video prior to obtaining a search warrant. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:11 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court provided a unanimous decision in a recent Marijuana DUI ruling. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:11 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court provided a unanimous decision in a recent Marijuana DUI ruling. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
During their search of SPI's and CDS's offices pursuant to the warrants, agents found eleven computers and the shared network server. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
The move aims to protect the Fourth Amendment rights of innocent bystanders against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:01 am
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can the police search my car without a warrant? [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:27 am
The Defense Lawyer argued that his client was unlawfully stopped, and searched, due to an anonymous call to police. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:13 am
Search and Seizure that occur in the home are subject to the highest scrutiny by the Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
EFF is urging the California Supreme Court to hold that the state’s arrestee DNA collection law violates privacy and search and seizure protections guaranteed under the California constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:26 am
California that police needed to obtain a warrant before searching the contents of a cell phone. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:07 am
One of the curious anomalies in statistics about cost drivers in California is that the southern part of the state is disproportionately represented.Researchers have implied, but never out-right said, that perhaps one explanation is nefarious activity by various vendors operating in the territory.Prosecutors recently unsealed an indictment alleging individuals connected to an chiropractor and physician in an illegal kickback scheme - the WorkCompCentral analysis of the size of that scheme revealed… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 8:34 am
San Diego Nov 10 2015: Eight medical professionals and associates are charged in federal grand jury indictments with buying and selling patients in a bribery scheme involving $25 million in improper claims for medical services and devices which were then billed to California Workers’ Compensation insurance companies.FBI agents along with investigators from the California Department of Insurance and the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office served five search… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:03 pm
A DUI blood test taken by Police for investigating impairment is considered a search and seizure, protected by our 4th Amendment rights. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:03 pm
A DUI blood test taken by Police for investigating impairment is considered a search and seizure, protected by our 4th Amendment rights. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:31 am
The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
However, even as the amount of media we create and store has increased, the laws governing its search and seizure have failed to keep up. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
Fourth Amendment rights turn on whether the search or seizure takes place territorially or extraterritorially; the government’s surveillance authorities depend on whether the target is located within the United States or without; and courts’ warrant jurisdiction extends, with limited exceptions, only to the border’s edge. [read post]
