Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 6,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Coty Germany (a seller of luxury cosmetic goods) brought proceedings against Parfümerie Akzente (distributor) in order to prevent it from selling on the platform “amazon.de”. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am
Following Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30; [2004] 1 AC 260, this was fatal to the granting of third party debt orders. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:32 am
Further, it is advisable for purchasers to obtain a statutory declaration from the seller, setting out the property status for the year of the sale and the year prior. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:45 am
Trafigura Beheer Ltd v Renbrandt Ltd On 1 December the Commercial Court gave a judgment for the Claimant seller in this matter, which arose out of the sale of a cargo of gas oil in 2008. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The bank, as seller, would thus have an incentive to raise the APR to the highest rate, and then freeze it at that rate (as a static rate, rather than a variable one) before disposing of the account as a bad debt. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:19 am
Returning Relists Sykes v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:06 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:13 am
Akzente was one of these distributors, primarily selling through their store, website and Amazon as a third-party seller. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
[v] Both M&A and LBO transactions experienced an uptrend from 2014 to 2016 and peaked in 2015 compared to VC and Seed Round Angel transactions. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeals zeroed in on the First Department’s core finding that “the Appellate Division affirmed . . . because a rescission action unequivocally evinces the plaintiff’s intent to disavow its contractual obligations, the commencement of such an action before the date of performance constitutes an anticipatory breach’ (Princes Point LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeals zeroed in on the First Department’s core finding that “the Appellate Division affirmed . . . because a rescission action unequivocally evinces the plaintiff’s intent to disavow its contractual obligations, the commencement of such an action before the date of performance constitutes an anticipatory breach’ (Princes Point LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:34 pm
V. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:34 pm
V. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:24 pm
In a 1931 opinion, Manufacturers Finance Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:41 pm
Dugan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
In the first, Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
This Paul Weiss memo reviews the Chancery Court’s recent decision in van der Fluit v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:28 am
Benisek v. [read post]
