Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Plaintiffs and the federal government filed suit against North Carolina, alleging that House Bill 589 violates equal protection provisions of the United States Constitution and the Voting Rights Act and seeking a preliminary injunction. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm
In that case, Shapero v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:26 am
The court found that the matter of whether the work was professional or not turned on state law, and as the work was performed in North Carolina, that state’s law controlled. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
The other thirteen were campaigning in California, Ohio, Indiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:22 pm
Virginia State Bar, which like the North Carolina Dental Board, was a state entity for some purposes. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Rice, Attorney-Client Privilege in the United States, §9:22, at 82 (2013-2014 ed. 2013). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court will be hearing arguments from both the defendant and the State of North Carolina on October 6, 2014. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
Beverage Systems of the Carolinas, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
Their child, B.F.S.R., was born in Cabarrus County, North Carolina, in 2006, and was a citizen of both Mexico and the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In a seminal case in North Carolina, Hinkamp v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Turner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
These criteria have become the focal point as the emphasis has shifted away from identifying a child’s biological relationship and towards recognizing the social, economic, and emotional ties that arise from living in a family unit together. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
For more on the antitrust state action immunity doctrine (though not in a way that would be directly relevant to this case), see the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
