Search for: "State v. Adams" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
  This 944 page edition is edited by New Zealand privacy academic, Nicole Moreham and by Adam Speker KC. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Just Security
United States by Marty Lederman (@marty_lederman), Mary B. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Human Rights at Home Blog, Jeremiah Ho weighs in on Matal v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
Heller applies to the states. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
” At this blog, Alan Horowitz analyzes last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:03 am by Russ Bensing
  Well, they did; in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, citing  Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]