Search for: "State v. Bell" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Rachit Buch
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm by Elliot Harmon
One Weird Trick for Forcing Defendants to Settle This story starts in 2007 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am by Richard Hunt
File first in federal court or, in all likelihood, lose in state court. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Member States aim for total consensus on the draft convention's text. [read post]
29 Jul 2006, 4:36 am
The one that is most often cited is from Kansas: State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
Blue Bell, Inc., 778 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1985) was “questionable. [read post]