Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1961 - 1980 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 11:56 am by Donna Bader
  While I can well understand that judges will not be required to pay the costs of appeal for correcting their decisions, I think she has a point. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Relying solely on a criminal case citing a personal injury case – both of which dealt with minimum constitutional requirements for memorandum opinions of appellate courts to “state reasons for the disposition” (see People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:21 am
RubinsteinRandall Comments: Court review of university decisions concerning the appointment of faculty is limited as demonstrated in Perinpanayagam v University At Buffalo & State Univ. of N. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
To download a copy of the Court of Appeals' decision, please use this link: Marmelstein v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
The Court of Appeals addressed this issue in People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
The Court of Appeals addressed this issue in People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is hearing the Trump campaign's appeal on an expedited basis. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:27 am by William McGrath
His Motion to Dismiss was granted in the District Court, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case to the District Court. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
The AmeriKat is struck by this political 'division' (as much as there can be in a unanimous decision) in the court in a patent case. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Employee found guilty of disciplinary charges involving absence from work based on records generated by global positioning equipmentMatter of Halpin v Klein, 62 AD3d 403*Joel I. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am by Florian Mueller
Its temporary (but indefinite) withdrawal from the German market enables the high-volume smartphone maker (and its OnePlus affiliate) to stand its ground in court:Motions to stay the enforcement of those four injunctions are pending, and while I can't predict what the appeals courts in Munich and Karlsruhe (the latter for the Mannheim rulings) will do, there are serious issues that may very well prove outcome-determinative.OPPO is now aggressively seeking its own… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 pm by Josh Blackman
New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal First, the New York Court of Appeals decided Regina Metropolitan Co. v. [read post]