Search for: "State v. D. H." Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Evaluating the applicant’s assertion of a violation of the duty to state reasons, the Court recited Articles 75 CTMR and Article 50(2)(h) of Regulation 2868/95, which prescribe the duty to state reason in relation to the OHIM’s decisions, and stated that the requisite aims to allow the parties to know the justification for an act or measure, enabling them to protect their rights, and to allow the EU judges to review its legality. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
I'll now quote three paragraphs from Motorola's position stated in the proposed pretrial order for the Microsoft case and will comment below each quoted paragraph. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel has a video preview of New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
For publication opinions today (4): In a much reported adoption case [see ILB entry - "State appeals twin girls' adoption by N.J. man" from Jan. 21, 2007], Adoption of Infants H., Marion Co. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
So, a notice under section 8 would fall under section 7 H(W)A. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:47 am
So if any state legislators are considering adding the fourth child pornography crime to their criminal code, I'd respectfully suggest they go with the access or view option. [read post]