Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1961 - 1980 of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Lauren E. Quigley
  The Second Circuit held that the non-bank loan holder was not entitled to the preemptive protection of the National Bank Act, which allows nationally chartered banks to export the interest rates of their home state without being subject to the usury limits of any other state in which the bank makes loans. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
  To give a majority of the existing holders security in their ownership of the corporation, and to expressly prevent its dilution.All that's undercut -- egregiously -- by the Court of Appeal's holding. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 See Dulong, 261 S.W.3d at 894; McFarland, 293 S.W.3d at 763-64 (cases holding creditor could collect debt on account stated where, based on series of transactions reflected on account statements, creditor established that card holder agreed to full amount shown on statements and impliedly promised to pay indebtedness). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  The Court stated that “[d]ue diligence did not require defendant to raise any claims against plaintiff in its counterclaims against the other lien holders, which concerned only the priority of competing liens. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am by Anna Christensen
Continuing the coverage of Tuesday’s oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by Oyez Project
Holder No. 10-553: Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
The information holder would have to address difficult questions of proportionality in disclosing confidential information: the only help was the (limited) Guidance, which set too low a threshold for overriding duties of confidentiality [96-100]; and clear guidance was needed for information holders as to how to assess proportionality when considering whether or not information should be shared [101]. [read post]