Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 1961 - 1980
of 29,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
The Statute passed in New York State in August 2022 is part of a legislative package to “honor and support Holocaust survivors in educational, cultural, and financial institutions,” and to put forth paths to improve education about the Nazi period.[10] The Claims Conference: Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, an organization that secures material compensation for Holocaust survivors around the world, produced a study in 2020 that examined the knowledge of… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:47 am
HvJ EU 24 november 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:923, NIPR 2022-549 (Tilman/Unilever) / p. 51-58 Abstract Tilman v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:08 am
Cardozo stated for the court in the case of Meinhard v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:16 am
Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit works to protect Microsoft and its customers from digital threats. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
”[1] Courts have used that doctrine to create a rapidly-changing body of legal interpretation while, at the same time, the various levels of government create new laws and, as importantly, new regulations at a rate that taxes the brainpower of some of the country’s best lawyers. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Even where it is clear that the nominee is completely independent from the nominating stockholder, the nominating stockholder presumably has a compelling reason for engaging in a proxy fight, so the voting stockholders will need answers to an additional level of questions to better understand the interests, agenda, plans and proposals of the nominating stockholder, and how the nominee is expected to further that agenda. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
There is a logical failing here, and it creates a two-tiered level of access to legal process as a result. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm
We do this at Georgia State and the results are usually wonderful. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Marchand v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
However, the same is not true for individual state-level government officials, where the governance mechanisms lack the checks-and-balances that gridlock Congress. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
But the most important early debate concerned levels of generality. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:49 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:28 am
L v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:20 am
As CJ Roberts wrote for the Court last Term in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
Its web site states “We believe it is difficult for large corporate publishers who often suffer from very high levels of staff turnover, top down management and offshored production processes to replicate the dynamic, responsive and efficient publishing service we can provide”. [read post]
