Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Marks, No. 05-30218 (6-13-08). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Already, LLC d/b/a YUMS v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Solohay, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:39 am
Jason Green v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:37 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
State Law Claims. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:01 pm
Today marks the 34th anniversary of the decision in Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:41 pm
The court’s opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:06 am
Speaking for the unanimous Court, Rothstein J. stated: “In order for the owner of a registered trade-mark to have exclusive use of the trade-mark throughout Canada, there cannot be a likelihood of confusion with another trade-mark anywhere in the country. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 3:55 am
NT-MDT LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am
The recent case of Claydon v Mzuri is a particularly harsh example of the application of the prior use case law. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:25 am
Stoncor Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
In Grand Canyon West Ranch v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:15 am
Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:13 am
The state joins a growing list of GOP-led states that have embraced expanded postpartum Medicaid coverage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
