Search for: "State v. Poole"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 3,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
However, in the case of Batson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:52 am
The question is whether ASM's and Shift Supervisors are eligible for tips under the New York Labor Law.The case is Barenboim v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
However, the recent Court of Appeal decision of Duschesne v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
The recently decided case of Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm
Federal and state law compliance-related issues may be confusing and challenging for employers. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
In a footnote, the SEC cited Wonsover v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
Further, each state constitution may provide new routes. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
I'll now quote three paragraphs from Motorola's position stated in the proposed pretrial order for the Microsoft case and will comment below each quoted paragraph. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
RITCHIE, ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:02 am
At issue in Barenboim v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:03 am
Vance v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:03 pm
The case is Lakeview Investment LP v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
The very first bill he signed as president was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which restored the protection to victims of pay discrimination that had been gutted by the Supreme Court in its 2007 ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The CFTC stated that a single interest rate swap or foreign exchange hedge could drag the fund manager into the definition of “Commodity Pool Operator” (7 USC §1a(10) and have to register with the CFTC. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
(to be continued) - Vinod Kothari & Soma Bagaria [1] In case of Surat Peoples’ Co-Operative Bank v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 5:29 pm
She sued Garcia in state court seeking money damages. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:07 am
In Zeckler v Assigned Risk Pool Manager Capita Commercial Services Ltd [2012], the High Court held, on appeal, that the Solicitors Indemnity Insurance Rules 2009 r.10.3 (the Rule) could not be relied upon to hold personally liable a partner in a limited liability partnership for the partnership's unpaid professional indemnity insurance premiums.The appellant (Zeckler) had been one of two partners in a limited liability solicitors' practice, Zecklers LLP. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:43 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
Heeb's stated results support his overarching conclusion, namely that skill predominates over chance in poker. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
