Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Consider the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Sharp Corporation, et. al (Docket Report) Stays pending patent reexamination: Sweetening the deal: TDY Industries v Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court E D California: False marking complaint alleging defendant had ‘no reasonable basis to believe’ its products were patented sufficiently pled intent to deceive: Hallstrom v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
In Greenhouse v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
” Anyone who doubts his intellectual toughness and his willingness to engage in sharp debate should just take a look at his dissents over the last ten years, from Bush v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am
A recent Australian decision in the case of Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156[2] highlights the problem. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) - at the end of May. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:40 am
Perhaps it’s stating the obvious, but it can’t hurt to have reminders of this. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
” However, in the Gordon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Late last month, in Gottlieb v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 8:06 am
., Elrod v. [read post]
