Search for: "State v. Smart"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
There are also minimum requirements addressing the use of smart contracts for data sharing purposes. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm
That said, Judge Grady’s “Order Concerning Format of Fee Petitions,” Cristancho v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:38 pm
Smart money says the Jeff will be looking high and low for Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:16 pm
– Romano v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:02 pm
(I suppose you could count Snyder v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:45 am
That’s what allowed them to come up with probably the worst 4th Amendment decision of all time, Whren v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:34 am
In H.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court decision, Bates v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
United States, No. 10-587C (March 29, 2011). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:40 pm
The decision that came out of the Maine Supreme Court last week in FNMA v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:36 am
Update: At Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Kontorovich argues that the ACLU suit will fail: Under the basic Mathews v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
In the final argument of the Term, in Nevada Ethics Commission v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
But, critically, the initial stop must have been justified under Terry v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:45 am
Forget Mapp v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
