Search for: "State v. Strange" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am by Skylar Hunter
With respect to the latter point, one need only look back at a 2018 decision (San Francisco Police Officers’ Assn. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
  Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm by Amy Howe
Michael Dreeben, the deputy solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, faced a slightly more (but not completely) receptive audience. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, American Risk Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:00 am by Justin P. Webb
Additionally, its hard to see where a case like this fits within juvenile 8th Amendment cases such as Roper v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
That said, I don’t think we need to get there yet: I think Savannah read the confidentiality statute correctly, and so tweeted only the names of the perpetrators, which she unquestionably had a right to do (Butterworth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:36 pm
e) Readers may recollect the classic case of the printer of company documents who used the price sensitive information in such documents to deal in their shares and make profit (United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Dwight Sullivan
I was able to catch the second half of today’s inaugural argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
  And - this is the point this post is working its way toward - it's not a tool that's unique to the powerful political movement kick-started by the Supreme Court's Roe v. [read post]