Search for: "Stewart, Appeal of" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 6:25 pm
But in terms of audience appeal, I'd rank it the other way around. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Stewart was found guilty by a jury of 15, 11 of whom were Campbells. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 8:11 am
If so, what was the result of the appeal and did the case make it to Tax Court? [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
"The facts contained in the article were not private," 5th District Court of Appeal Justice Bert Levy wrote. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stewart, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 593 (26 March 2009) Farrell, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 511 (13 March 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AF (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 240 (26 March 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Thorpe v Revenue and Customs [2009] EWHC 611 (Ch) (26 [...] [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Stewart will represent the FEC. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:55 am
Death penalty cases are far and away the most expensive for the state to prosecute, and 68 percent of them are reversed on appeal - meaning, the state has wasted its money two-thirds of the time. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Perry was not as successful with this theory in challenging a determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board denying him benefits after finding that his employment was terminated due to his misconduct. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:13 am
  Before anyone screams, "logical fallacy, appeal to ignorance," cool yer jets. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:11 pm
You know Twitter is really hitting the mainstream when it's getting made fun of by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 8:41 am
 One such case is  Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, 20 February 2009, a decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales (Lords Justices Waller, Thomas and Richards).This case arose from a set of facts that might initially seem to the casual observer to have little to do with IP at all. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
If this opinion wasn't meant to call Stewart into question (which it surely wasn't), I wish they'd have said that.I don't know. [read post]