Search for: "Study v. State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 15,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
In this Article, I present the flurry of engagement with the history of the Fourteenth Amendment during the litigation of Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My favorite illustration concerns Congress’s power “to regulate commerce among the states. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:30 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The letter follows a study from the Center for Countering Digital Hate which found that 11% of abortion searches in states with “trigger laws” – states which will automatically ban abortion if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am by Peter Mahler
Weidner (pictured left), Dean Emeritus and Alumni Centennial Professor at Florida State University College of Law, and Daniel S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by admin
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Instead of conducting these post-market surveillance studies, Ethicon stopped selling the products commercially. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The New Haven Roots of Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]