Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 8,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Marie Claire Album consents to the use or registration by Bata in the United States of the mark MARIE CLAIRE on or in connection with its goods, so long as such use is in accord with paragraph 2, above.6. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
On February 3, 2010, the United States District Court for the 3rd Circuit District found in David Beresford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 14–556. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:57 pm
Ever since he came to the United States, he has maintained his status as an O-1 visa holder. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12–842 _________________ REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, PETITIONER v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
In Pajkanovic v United States November 16, 2009, the 11th. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
United States Department of Homeland Security (D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 9:52 am
Petitioners therefore have filed these new petitions to try to stop the transplanted Chinese mattress operations that continue to crank out mattresses to the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
Read his powerful statement here.Environmental racism in the United States had already caught the attention of the UN. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre as United States Solicitor General. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
State, 632 N. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am
United States, in which it will consider the scope of its 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:54 am
Corcoran, noted here, are relisted again, but United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am
United States (No. 09-1227), the Court ruled that a defendant may raise a Tenth-Amendment challenge to the statute under which she was convicted. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:07 pm
United States (No. 09-1227), the Supreme Court ruled that the defendant should have been permitted to raise a Tenth-Amendment challenge to the chemical-weapons statute that she was convicted of violating. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:36 pm
Declaring the NLRB’s rationale to be “nonsense,” on March 26, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Stern Produce Company Inc v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
The Court mandated that the United States Environmental Protection Agency act upon a rulemaking petition concerning dust-levels and lead-paint standards.The panel held that the EPA was under a duty stemming from the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 to update lead-based paint and dust-lead hazard standards in light of the obvious need, and a duty under the Administrative Procedure Act to fully respond to… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
United States, 349 U. [read post]
