Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 7,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Practically, this means that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can no longer refuse to register such marks. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:06 am
Case date: 12 June 2019 Case number: No. 18-3020 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:50 pm
” Likewise, Leadiant’s letter to healthcare providers, which was sent to hundreds of doctors around the United States, also constituted false advertising when it stated that “VSL#3 is the same quality product, containing the same genus and species of bacteria, in the same proportions that you have come to expect. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
It permits the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) to exclude certain items from importation, directing Customs and Border Patrol to deny their entry. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Formal registration of copyrights with the United States Copyright Office is not required to establish copyrights. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director, who is an executive branch government official, can choose to institute IPR proceedings based on his or her own discretion, rather than a private party deciding to institute proceedings. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm
In 2017, Brunetti filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register the trademark representing this brand—FUCT (“Friends U Can’t Trust”). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” The first is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
Friday, June 28, 2019 10:30 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host a debate titled, “Should the United States severely restrict Huawei's business? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:03 am
Brunetti the United States Supreme Court held that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Unscrupulous notices are prepared and sent by private companies that are not associated with CIPO, WIPO or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Unscrupulous notices are prepared and sent by private companies that are not associated with CIPO, WIPO or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
