Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 51,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
The first instance DDJ had said an opposed stay could not be given because of Halsey v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
Secondary meaning generally requires a showing that the design: has been in substantial commercial use (as shown by marketing budgets and materials, number of sales, surveys, and the like)the source has used the design continuously and exclusively (at least 5 years), and is distinctive (relative to other similar products).Trade dress protection can be raised as a legal claim in a law suit against, for example, someone selling or manufacturing knockoff products, such as in the … [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
" Now someone applies for a permit to use a field that is typically used for football, soccer, or ultimate frisbee for "planting, cultivating, and harvesting pumpkins. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
This decision was largely confirmed in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley (No 2) [2023] QSC 215. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
You may wonder how this is possible, given that Barrie died in 1937—over 86 years ago. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
" Consider the claim in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:03 am
Boyko v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Contact us online or call us at (519) 821-5465 to schedule a confidential consultation and learn how we can assist you. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Contact us online or call us at (519) 821-5465 to schedule a confidential consultation and learn how we can assist you. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
The letter’s purpose, stated in its first paragraph, was “to confirm each of our intent so that formal agreements can be prepared” and that “this letter is not intended to be binding on either of us. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
If so, consideration should be given to whether Ms Imam’s need to be provided with suitable accommodation could be met out of that fund. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 6:45 am
Many of us questioned Mueller hiring Weissmann given his reputation for stretching legal authority and perceived political bias. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
They’ve been used to start revolutions and to stop wars. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
The Constitution uses the words "Duties, Imposts, and Excises – all of which are subject to the rule of uniformity, not apportionment—as being in the words of the Hylton v. [read post]
