Search for: "US v. Green" Results 1961 - 1980 of 6,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am by Tessa Shepperson
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
LEXIS 76932 (ED CA, Oct. 2, 2007) and Green v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Many of the allegations in the complaint and the proposed amended complaint are made upon information and belief, which is “not sufficient to establish the necessary quantum of proof to sustain allegations of fraud” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Green (In re Green), 200 B.R. 296, 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (collecting cases); see also Kerusa Co. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
  The court’s reference to “fruit” is a shorthand way of referring to the exclusionary that is used to enforce the 4th Amendment’s prohibitions. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
I am quite excited by the exchange between Jack and Chris Green about the meaning of the oath of fidelity to the Constitution. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Geoquip (Patently-O) (Patents Post Grant Blog) CAFC: Using foreign infringement judgment to prove infringement in the US: Quad/Tech v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 1:24 pm
Jack Watterson & Nathanial Green (PDF format) for its facts about using a guardianship in a third-party custody matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:14 am by gmlevine
Forum December 12, 2000) (the panel allowed a complaint to be refiled because the previous Panel had “expressly reserved the right of Complainant to recharge bad faith registration and use of the domain name in issue”) ; or to correct a deficiency in pleading, Jones Apparel Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am by Charles Sartain
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Here BP claimed that the second defendant, which ran a filling station under the ‘TOP’ brand used the same colour green as them, and argued that members of the public would be confused into thinking their garage was a BP garage. [read post]