Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 8:17 am by Rich Vetstein
Didn’t she waive any common law right that the note holder and mortgage holder be united for foreclosure. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm by Ken
Now, in the entire time I have been paying attention to politics, there has only been one President of the United States elected from Texas. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The concept of adverse possession was subsequently adopted in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:46 am
The plaintiffs, The Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Connecticut (Diocese), the Reverend Canon David Cannon, Bishop Seabury Church (Parish), and The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America (Episcopal Church), brought this action against the defendants, Ronald S. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:29 am by Duncan Hollis
 Under the [Sunken Military Craft Act], the rights, title and interest of the United States in any sunken military craft are protected absent an “express divestiture of title. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am by Melina Padron
He concludes that the limiting effects Protocol 30 will have will be minimal (if any at all), but reminds his readers that we may be getting a definitive answer on the matter once the case of NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-411/10) is decided by the CJEU. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, it quashed the subpoenas for all companies in which plaintiff claimed to have no ownership interest, except for SC Management. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Whatever power the United States Constitution envisions for the Executive in its exchanges with other nations or with enemy organizations in times of conflict, it most assuredly envisions a role for all three branches when individual liberties are at stake.Especially when contrasted with Korematsu, these positive actions by the Court are cause for celebration.On the other hand, since 9/11, the Court has also provided cause for consternation through its inaction. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm
Wolf, 443 U.S. at 602, the United States Supreme Court recognized a state's "obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes and in providing a civil forum where the ownership of church can be determined conclusively. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The title is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 16, 2011 Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
§ 1983 for violation of their civil rights, Miofsky, 703 F.2d at 338 (quoting Tovar v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Title 18, Section 713 regulates the use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress. [read post]