Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 1961 - 1980 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 4:47 pm by Dan Flynn
The United States v Paul Kruse trial in Austin, TX, has adjourned for the weekend. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, one of the cases that they considered at their private conference last week. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm by Luke Rioux
On 1/27/14 the United States Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:51 pm by Douglas Berman
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
It states that: “No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller and Wellons did not purchase an investment unit. [read post]