Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
First, discrimination may arise where the state fails to treat differently people whose situations are significantly different. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Nevertheless, the United States Tax Court disallowed the deductions, ruled for the Commissioner, and Vetrick appealed. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am
As Lord Brown said, he did not see any scope for these orders, for “levelling the playing field” or “providing equality of arms” between the parties. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
“‘We have a number of people in the United States whom we could not indict, there is not probable cause to indict them or to arrest them who present a threat of terrorism. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
We therefore affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Id. at *1. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court wrote that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:18 pm
In Cancer Voices et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
” It has been used consistently and exclusively for the secular purpose of honoring those who died fighting for the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am
United States, which struck down a statute requiring state officials to help enforce a federal gun control law) and it cannot do it circuitously, as with Section 1373. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
United Kingdom, which concerns retention of identity information in police records. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:23 am
Desimini v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:14 am
United StatesCampbell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:09 am
Fields, 113 F.3d 313, 324 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 (1997); United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 pm
Beaumont remains good law (“The Court is aware of United States v. [read post]
