Search for: "United States v. Miller" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
Supreme Court, New Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 902, New Title 34 in United States Code), offered tips and tricks to navigating member databases (Fastcase 7 Has Arrived, LexisNexis Digital Library New Multi-Volume Search Feature, Skip the Morning Paper with NewsBank), and pointed out specific titles available at Jenkins in both print and electronic formats (Corbin on Contracts, Drafting Patents for Litigation and Licensing, Social Media Law Resources). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
But although the economic effect of Miller/Macfarlane may have much in common with community of property, it is clear that the exercise under the 1973 Act does not relate to a matrimonial property regime: cf Case C-220/95 Van den Boogaard v Laumen (Case C-220/95) [1997] ECR I-1147, [1997] QB 759; Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] 2 WLR 709, para 57. 108. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
United States, a sentencing guidelines case, may prompt the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by Brock Meeks
During her 11-year term in the AG's office, she argued before the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 35 states in State Oil v. [read post]