Search for: "United States v. Reading Co." Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States Postal Service, No. 17-1594 (Whether the government is a “person” who can petition to institute a CBM;  Does a 1498(a) action count as an infringement action?) [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Court, applying Georgia law, entered its opinion in the case based on questions certified from the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:18 am by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
  In her 27 years as a justice, was a powerful voice in such opinions as United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" {The plaintiff omits the fact that she was an Assistant United States Attorney in this district from 1979 until 1983.} [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm, the Guardian cover the judgment and Seymour’s response to the ruling can be read here. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
During the Federal Action, plaintiff raised concerns regarding Liu’s conduct, submitting a letter application to United States District Judge John P. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:47 am by Dennis Crouch
 As Dennis Crouch has recently noted, the reach of SAS may soon be tested in United Therapeutics Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
United States should lead a court to find that the FTC lacks authority to issue competition rules. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
  According to the court, these Judges are “principal officers” and thus must be appointed by the President of the United States (rather than merely the head of the Commerce Dep’t). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]