Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 1961 - 1980 of 28,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(b) The Russian Federation shall immediately ensure that any military or irregulararmed units which may be directed or supported by it, as well as any organizationsand persons which may be subject to its control, direction or influence, take no stepsin furtherance of the military operations which have as their stated purpose andobjective preventing or punishing Ukraine for committing genocide. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
But the subsequent rush to declare non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) dead as an artform is wildly premature, and represents a misunderstanding of the law as well as the jury’s decision in the Hermès v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
For example, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 355 U.S. 66, 74, 78 S.Ct. 128, 133, 2 L.Ed.2d 95 (1957); United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
There is a parallel suit against the United States in the CFC. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
And Justice Ginsburg expressed concern that, if the Court holds for the respondents, any country would be able to sue the United States in their courts. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
 The Court stated that E-shops’ putative class consisted of all merchants in the United States that received chargeback claims from U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]