Search for: "Washington v. Downes" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2008, 9:31 pm
The complaint in Heller, et al., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Calling for the views of the SG just kicks the can down the road as a formal matter, but it’s good news for the petitioners as a statistical matter. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
The first two cases are from a place where, if my sources are to be believed, the wind comes sweepin’ down the plain, where there is plenty of air and plenty of room. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
The combined cases the Court heard for about ninety minutes (EPA v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:03 am by Cormac Early
 Coverage of the impending renovation comes from Bill Mears of CNN, Pete Williams at MSNBC’s First Read blog, and the Associated Press (via the Washington Post). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Reed, whose 40th anniversary is being celebrated this week at a star-studded panel in Washington, D.C., and Romer v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Put aside for the moment the fact that West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Texas 167 days 6-3 3; Roberts(m), Stevens(c), Breyer(d) Washington State Grange v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:32 am by Lyle Denniston
Analysis The longer the argument in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
In June the MSPB issued a terrible ruling in MacLean v. [read post]