Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 66,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 3:17 am
Giving the leading judgment Lord Carnwath reasoned that reference had to be made to the government’s practice as well as the text of the nationality law of the state in question. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:18 am
Tecnomatic, S.p.A. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The Delhi High Court has read down s. 377 to exclude consensual sex between adults in private in its judgment in Naz Foundation v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STATE V. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 8:55 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
United States, an important traffic stop case that changes North Carolina law as it pertains to certain drug dog sniffs, and perhaps other investigative techniques as well. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 3:31 am
In Harris v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:47 am
In Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:19 am
Well, they got rid of Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:47 am
(Order in Olsen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 3:14 pm
Supreme Court in Bates v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:35 am
(Note, for example, just from yesterday, State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
The Commission argued that the issuance of a Wells Notice does not terminate the Commission's investigative power, citing a 2005 Oregon case, SEC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
