Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 7:25 am by Rick Hasen
William Baude and Michael McConnell in The Atlantic: In a constitutional republic like ours, legislatures ultimately derive their authority from the people. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
       Tomorrow the Court will hear oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am by Jeffrey Kirchmeier
” Unlike those justices, Ginsburg was not on the Supreme Court for the landmark death penalty decisions upholding the modern death penalty in the 1970s and 1980s, such as Gregg v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:09 am by Dan Ernst
This story led to an important 1967 Supreme Court decision—Time, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, William Goren looks at Monday’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am by James Beck - Guest
Crucial to the ultimate decision will be how today’s Court views the scope of a ten-year-old, five-four decision, Geier v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 8:53 am by Ronald Collins
Justice William Brennan granted O’Brien access to his court papers, as O’Brien told this blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm by Anthony Gaughan
For instance, they describe a a short but telling November 2017 exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Scott Gant (counsel for the Department of the Interior) in the case of Patchak v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Jane Schacter is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Kelly asked the Supreme Court to weigh in, which it agreed to do last summer; Baroni has joined her in asking the justices to overturn their convictions. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The U.S. government, as an amicus, supports Wyoming; arguing for the U.S. will be William M. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Bob Corn-Revere
That paradox presents itself to the Justices yet again in McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am by Eric Segall
Dooley's charge that the justices follow the election returns.There is no debate that the Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]