Search for: "York v York"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 52,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
# # #DECISIONBeer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
’”Since it agreed that there were “triable issues of fact” as to whether these elements had been met in this case, the AD1 thought that the underlying motion had been appropriately denied.Now that’s an adverse, adverse-possession determination ….# # #DECISION195E76 LLC v 197 E. 76th St., LLC [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Linda Greenhouse mentioned her in the New York Times, and that is always something. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm
The decision in Matter of Hoffmann v New York State Independent Redistricting Commission is here. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
In Scanlon et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
A New York lawyer who threatened to report restaurant employees who were speaking Spanish to ICE in 2018 was censured under NY Rule 8.4(h). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
By Lauren Gowler Picture this. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Mercantile Exch., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Mercantile Exch., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”Given that conflict, the AD1 left the outcome undisturbed.Looks like there’s considerable room for improvement here …..# # #DECISIONE. v AIMCO 240 W. 73rd St., LLC [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 2:00 am
New York Times Op-Ed: Want to Tax the Rich for Real? [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
Garland v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am
As we observed earlier this year, courts and legislatures across the country are still trying to figure out the meaning and limits of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
”Musk cites Perry v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am
Hill, which held that a family suing Life Magazine for false light must shoulder the burden of the actual malice standard under New York Times v. [read post]
