Search for: ""Abbott v. Abbott" OR "560 U.S. 1""
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 9 (2010). [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010) (“An accession is effective only between the acceding country and those contracting states that have accepted the accession. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 10, 130 S.Ct. 1983, 176 L.Ed.2d 789 (2010), Vasquez's "ne exeat right is a right of custody under the [ Hague] Convention." [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:58 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 9 (2010). [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 9 (2010). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:51 pm
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 9 (2010)). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010) where the Supreme Court held that a ne exeat right is a right of custody, not a mere “right of access. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 10, 130 S.Ct. 1983, 176 L.Ed.2d 789 (2010). [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 15, (2010) (“[T]he joint right to determine [a] child’s country of residence ... is a right of custody under the Convention. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:50 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 10-21, 130 S.Ct. 1983, 176 L.Ed.2d 789 (2010). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 7, 8, 20 (2010). [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 21 (2010). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
