Search for: ""Anders v. California" OR "386 U.S. 738"" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm by B.W. Barnett
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and elaborated upon in Bledsoe v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:47 pm by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:11 am by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:09 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), that appointed defense counsel may withdraw from “frivolous” criminal appeals, and held that “in any direct criminal appeal as a matter of right, counsel must submit an advocative brief in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 46. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm by David Behm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the [client] requests that a no-merit report be filed or declines to consent to have the attorney close the file without further representation by the attorney. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:10 pm by Jeff Gamso
On November 7, 2011, counsel for Gilbert filed a no-error brief pursuant to Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:14 am by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he raises two sentencing issues. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:24 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:19 am by Jonathan Holbrook
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that he could not find any meritorious issues to argue and asking the court to conduct its own review. [read post]