Search for: ""Apprendi v. New Jersey" OR "530 U.S. 466"" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 6:33 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) because the jury wasn't required to find that the death resulted from the conspiracy. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:20 am by Carl Folsom
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the Court held that Sixth Amendment rights applied to any factual findings that increased a maximum punishment. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:16 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), overturned the repeated holding of the Supreme Court, see, e.g., Rose v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:00 pm by Jeff Lorenzo
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) require “any fact” other than a prior conviction “that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt The government argued that the First Circuit properly interpreted the Supreme Court's warning “against expanding the Apprendi doctrine far beyond its necessary boundaries. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:34 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476-77 (2000) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt for the "death resulting" element. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)), and/or the mandatory minimums (implicating Harris v. [read post]