Search for: ""Apprendi v. New Jersey" OR "530 U.S. 466"" Results 41 - 60 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 4:05 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:27 pm by Steve Kalar
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 . . . (2000), for the district court to have determined that his prior convictions were separate incidents, and that such determination had to be made by a jury. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 7:09 am by Christy Love
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), and also 18 U.S.C. 3742(g) and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 2:14 pm by Frank Heft
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and recent statutory interpretation of those provisions. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 7:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the panel found the reasoning persuasive. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), his counsel should have raised a Sixth Amendment challenge to the sentencing enhancements, even though Nichols was sentenced in 2002, more than two years before the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm by The Blog Team
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its copious progeny, which generally authorize district courts to find facts that do not increase the statutory sentencing range. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am by WSLL
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is applicable where the consecutive sentence Appellant received is beyond the statutory maximum, and was not presented to the jury for the enhancement of the sentence. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); Texas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), only a jury has the power to determine whether he had proven by clear and convincing evidence that his bank robbery did not qualify as one of the three strikes to mandate a mandatory life sentence. [read post]