Search for: ""Apprendi v. New Jersey" OR "530 U.S. 466""
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), a sentencing court may determine the existence of the defendant's prior criminal record of convictions as a sentence enhancement factor, which is the only type of sentence enhancement factor exempt from jury fact finding. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:09 pm
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its reinvigoration of the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:26 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:49 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 496 (2000) (relying, in part, on this principle in holding that constitution does not require that prior convictions be submitted to jury and found beyond reasonable doubt). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 496 (2000) (relying, in part, on this principle in holding that constitution does not require that prior convictions be submitted to jury and found beyond reasonable doubt). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the sentencing judge determined the applicable drug quantities (and thereby the statutory maximum and minimum penalty and the guideline range) whether a conviction was by a jury or by a guilty plea. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (Any fact exposing a defendant to a greater punishment than the statutory maximum must be considered by the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (Any fact exposing a defendant to a greater punishment than the statutory maximum must be considered by the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and Texas Department of Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (Any fact exposing a defendant to a greater punishment than the statutory maximum must be considered by the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
California (2007) 549 U.S.__ [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham), compelling reduction of the sentence to the midterm. [read post]
