Search for: ""Blakely v. Washington" OR "542 U.S. 296""
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2021, 4:38 am
Blakely v.Washington 542 U.S.296 (2004) exogenously introduced a significant constraint... [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:12 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, LII link (2004), a fact that enhances a defendant's sentence must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt (not found by a judge by the preponderance of the evidence). [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:32 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled on March 1 that a New York state statute that permits stiffer sentences for persistent felony offenders violates defendant's constitutional rights. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:18 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) line of cases to consecutive sentencing determinations. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, Ralph Blakely pleaded guilty in a Washington State Superior Court to kidnapping his estranged wife. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:51 am
Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 . [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:59 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) are not subject to the holding in that case. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), a three-judge panel unanimously concluded the state scheme vested unconstitutionally broad discretion in judges to set sentences. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).... [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:24 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 303 (2004) [facts affecting sentence must be found by a jury]. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296(Blakely). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:14 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 305-08 (2004). [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:26 pm
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 10:35 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), but we hold that Blakely imposes no such requirement. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), requires that facts (other than prior convictions) necessary to imposing consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:37 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
