Search for: ""California v. Hodari D." OR "499 U.S. 621""
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 6:20 am
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991), addresses when a seizure of a person can be said to occur, specifically whether it is when a person is told by a police officer to “stop. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:45 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626 (1991) (because the defendant had not been seized when he discarded a rock of crack cocaine, the Fourth Amendment did not require suppression of the drugs); Florida v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 8:22 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 627 (1991) ("since the addressee [of a police order to stop] has no ready means of identifying the deficient [orders] it almost invariably is the responsible course to comply"). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:38 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), which reformulated the definition of a seizure of a person under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), about whether there was a different approach for applications of physical force to a person. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991) that a person is seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when (1) an officer applies physical force, however slight, to the person or (2) the person submits to an officer’s show of authority. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). [read post]
