Search for: ""California v. Hodari D." OR "499 U.S. 621""
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), the Supreme Court arguably cast doubt on whether suppression is appropriate in this situation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991), that a person who does not submit to a show of authority cannot be seized until physically detained by the police. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991), the encounter is consensual and no reasonable suspicion is required. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 8:22 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 627 (1991) ("since the addressee [of a police order to stop] has no ready means of identifying the deficient [orders] it almost invariably is the responsible course to comply"). [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991) (holding that the standard "is an objective one: not whether the citizen perceived that he was being ordered to restrict his movement, but whether the officer's words and actions would have conveyed that to a reasonable person. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626 (1991) ("An arrest requires either physical force (as described above) or, where that is absent, submission to the assertion of authority. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 7:53 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629 (1991), as providing "strong impli[cation]" for this rule). [read post]
