Search for: ""Coolidge v. New Hampshire" OR "403 U.S. 443"" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2006, 9:31 am
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 481 (1971) ("The warrant requirement . . . is not an inconvenience to be somehow 'weighed' against the claims of police efficiency"). [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) did not apply.Ruling: The Court of Appeals rejected all of the district court's reasons for suppressing the evidence.The lower court first held that, due to the defendants' absence, the vehicles were not readily mobile, and hence Coolidge did not apply. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Jim Jenkins
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 448, (1971)(even if a citizen feels obliged to assist law enforcement, it is not part of the policy underlying the 4th and 14th Amendment to discourage citizens from aiding law enforcement in apprehending criminals). [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:24 am
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 448, (1971)(even if a citizen feels obliged to assist law enforcement, it is not part of the policy underlying the 4th and 14th Amendment to discourage citizens from aiding law enforcement in apprehending criminals). [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm by CAPTAIN
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 455 (1971).On that final note, Fox News contributor, former Judge Andrew Napolitano, wrote a must read piece yesterday he called: "Poking holes in the Fourth Amendment to let government snoop on you". [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971). [read post]