Search for: ""Crawford v. Washington" OR "541 U.S. 36"" Results 61 - 80 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
Washington that documents admitted without human testimony violate a defendant's right to confront a witness,when these documents are deemed to "testify" against him. 541 U.S. 36 (2004) The State of Massachusetts attempted to get around Crawford by making laboratory reports "self-authenticating documents" pursuant to state statute. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am by Kent Scheidegger
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004).)Comparing the efforts made in this case with those deemed sufficient in Roberts, it seems quite clear that they were more than sufficient. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), which bars testimonial hearsay evidence on the statements of a witness who does not testify at trial. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:27 am by Peter Tillers
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), impliedly overruled or "undermined" Owens? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
So one can expect further testing of the contours and limits of Crawford v Washington (541 U.S. 36 [2004]), particularity by prosecutors who can be expected to use Justice Sotomayor's opinion as a road map as to how to win her vote, and thus, a majority.It is not coincidental that this difficult 5-4 win was achieved by Jeffrey Fisher, who was the successful advocate in Crawford, and seven other criminal cases at the Supreme Court… [read post]