Search for: ""Dewsnup v. Timm" OR "502 U.S. 410""
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 417 (1992). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), this interpretation of section 506(d) was not correct. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), this interpretation of section 506(d) was not correct. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992) to prohibiting the strip-down of partially secured first mortgages in Chapter 7. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:27 am
However, back in 1992, in Dewsnup v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992) "rejected the reasoning of Folendore. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992) to be limited to partially secured first mortgages, and followed its own precedent -- handed down before Dewsnup v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:31 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), this interpretation of section 506(d) was not correct. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:31 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), this interpretation of section 506(d) was not correct. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), to come to the opposite conclusion. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:00 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), which held that a Chapter 7 debtor may not cram down an undersecured claim to the value of the collateral. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), which held that a Chapter 7 debtor may not cram down an undersecured claim to the value of the collateral. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) prohibits voiding its junior security deed. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), that section 506(d) cannot be used to modify secured claims on real estate in chapter 7 cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:40 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) prohibits voiding its junior security deed. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
., Dewsnup v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:27 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), stating that she found no authority in it that prevents a Chapter 7 debtor from cramming down a second mortgage in a Chapter 7 case. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
., Dewsnup v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), as support for their position. [read post]
